<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="style/detail_T.xsl"?>
<bibitem type="J">   <ARLID>0452314</ARLID> <utime>20240103211417.9</utime><mtime>20151216235959.9</mtime>   <SCOPUS>84926059721</SCOPUS> <WOS>000354589200011</WOS>  <DOI>10.1016/j.physa.2015.02.086</DOI>           <title language="eng" primary="1">Can the bivariate Hurst exponent be higher than an average of the separate Hurst exponents?</title>  <specification> <page_count>4 s.</page_count> <media_type>P</media_type> </specification>   <serial><ARLID>cav_un_epca*0257423</ARLID><ISSN>0378-4371</ISSN><title>Physica. A : Statistical Mechanics and its Applications</title><part_num/><part_title/><volume_id>431</volume_id><volume>1 (2015)</volume><page_num>124-127</page_num><publisher><place/><name>Elsevier</name><year/></publisher></serial>    <keyword>Correlations</keyword>   <keyword>Power-law cross-correlations</keyword>   <keyword>Bivariate Hurst exponent</keyword>   <keyword>Spectrum coherence</keyword>    <author primary="1"> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0256902</ARLID> <full_dept language="cz">Ekonometrie</full_dept> <full_dept language="eng">Department of Econometrics</full_dept> <department language="cz">E</department> <department language="eng">E</department> <full_dept>Department of Econometrics</full_dept>  <name1>Krištoufek</name1> <name2>Ladislav</name2> <institution>UTIA-B</institution> <garant>A</garant> <fullinstit>Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.</fullinstit> </author>   <source> <url>http://library.utia.cas.cz/separaty/2015/E/kristoufek-0452314.pdf</url> </source>        <cas_special> <project> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0303546</ARLID> <project_id>GP14-11402P</project_id> <agency>GA ČR</agency> <country>CZ</country> </project>  <abstract language="eng" primary="1">In this note, we investigate possible relationships between the bivariate Hurst exponent Hxy and an average of the separate Hurst exponents $/frac{1}{2}(H_x +H_y)$. We show that two cases are well theoretically founded. These are the cases when $H_{xy} = /frac{1}{2}(H_x + H_y )$ and $H_{xy} &lt; /frac{1}{2}(H_x + H_y )$. However, we show that the case of $H_{xy} &gt; /frac{1}{2}(H_x + H_y )$ is not possible regardless of stationarity issues. Further discussion of the implications is provided as well together with a note on the finite sample effect.</abstract>     <RIV>AH</RIV>    <reportyear>2016</reportyear>      <num_of_auth>1</num_of_auth>  <inst_support> RVO:67985556 </inst_support>  <permalink>http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0253719</permalink>   <confidential>S</confidential>          <unknown tag="mrcbT16-e">PHYSICS.MULTIDISCIPLINARY</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-f">1.738</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-g">0.554</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-h">8.8</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-i">0.02088</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-j">0.42</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-k">18034</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-s">0.677</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-4">Q2</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-5">1.276</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-6">793</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-7">Q2</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-B">49.081</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-C">71.5</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-D">Q3</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-E">Q3</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-P">71.519</unknown> <arlyear>2015</arlyear>       <unknown tag="mrcbU14"> 84926059721 SCOPUS </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbU34"> 000354589200011 WOS </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbU63"> cav_un_epca*0257423 Physica. A : Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 0378-4371 1873-2119 Roč. 431 č. 1 2015 124 127 Elsevier </unknown> </cas_special> </bibitem>