<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="style/detail_T.xsl"?>
<bibitem type="C">   <ARLID>0546853</ARLID> <utime>20231122150020.2</utime><mtime>20211019235959.9</mtime>   <SCOPUS>85116454250</SCOPUS> <WOS>000711926000023</WOS>  <DOI>10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_23</DOI>           <title language="eng" primary="1">Comparison of Shades and Hiddenness of Conflict</title>  <specification> <page_count>14 s.</page_count> <media_type>P</media_type> </specification>   <serial><ARLID>cav_un_epca*0546852</ARLID><ISBN>978-3-030-86771-3</ISBN><ISSN>0302-9743</ISSN><title>Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. 16th European Conference, ECSQARU 2021 Proceedings</title><part_num/><part_title/><page_num>314-327</page_num><publisher><place>Cham</place><name>Springer</name><year>2021</year></publisher><editor><name1>Vejnarová</name1><name2>J.</name2></editor><editor><name1>Wilson</name1><name2>N.</name2></editor></serial>    <keyword>Belief function</keyword>   <keyword>Conflict</keyword>   <keyword>Hidden conflict</keyword>   <keyword>N-consistency</keyword>   <keyword>Shades of conflict</keyword>   <keyword>Auto-conflict</keyword>    <author primary="1"> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0100740</ARLID> <name1>Daniel</name1> <name2>Milan</name2> <institution>UIVT-O</institution> <full_dept language="cz">Oddělení složitých systémů</full_dept> <full_dept language="eng">Department of Complex Systems</full_dept> <fullinstit>Ústav informatiky AV ČR, v. v. i.</fullinstit> </author> <author primary="0"> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0216188</ARLID> <name1>Kratochvíl</name1> <name2>Václav</name2> <institution>UTIA-B</institution> <full_dept language="cz">Matematická teorie rozhodování</full_dept> <full_dept>Department of Decision Making Theory</full_dept> <department language="cz">MTR</department> <department>MTR</department> <full_dept>Department of Decision Making Theory</full_dept> <country>CZ</country> <garant>K</garant> <fullinstit>Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.</fullinstit> </author>   <source> <url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_23</url>  </source>        <cas_special> <project> <project_id>GA19-04579S</project_id> <agency>GA ČR</agency> <country>CZ</country> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0380558</ARLID> </project>  <abstract language="eng" primary="1">Conflict, dissonance, inconsistency, entropy. There are many notions related to one phenomenon. When working with uncertainty, there can be different sources of information, and often they are in some level of mutual disagreement. When working with belief functions, one of the approaches how to measure conflict is closely connected with a belief mass assigned by the non-normalized conjunctive rule to the empty set. Recently, we have observed and presented cases where a conflict of belief functions is hidden (there is a zero mass assigned to the empty set by the non-normalized conjunctive rule). Above that, we distinguish several degrees of such a hiddeness. In parallel, Pichon et al. introduced a new family of conflict measures of different strengths, the so-called shades of conflict. In this paper, we compare both approaches not only from the theoretical point of view but also by examples.</abstract>    <action target="EUR"> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0415638</ARLID> <name>ECSQARU 2021: European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches with Uncertainty /16./</name> <dates>20210921</dates> <unknown tag="mrcbC20-s">20210924</unknown> <place>Prague</place> <country>CZ</country>  </action>  <RIV>IN</RIV> <FORD0>10000</FORD0> <FORD1>10200</FORD1> <FORD2>10201</FORD2>    <reportyear>2022</reportyear>      <num_of_auth>2</num_of_auth>  <unknown tag="mrcbC47"> UTIA-B 10000 10100 10101 </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbC52"> 4 A 4a 20231122150020.2 </unknown> <inst_support> RVO:67985807 </inst_support> <inst_support> RVO:67985556 </inst_support>  <permalink>http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0323231</permalink>  <cooperation> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0339298</ARLID> <name>UTIA</name> </cooperation>  <confidential>S</confidential>  <unknown tag="mrcbC86"> 3+4 Proceedings Paper Computer Science Artificial Intelligence|Computer Science Software Engineering|Mathematics Applied|Logic </unknown>        <unknown tag="mrcbT16-q">499</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-s">0.427</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-y">21.58</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-x">1.08</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-3">84158</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-4">Q2</unknown> <arlyear>2021</arlyear>    <unknown tag="mrcbTft">  Soubory v repozitáři: 0546853-afin.pdf </unknown>    <unknown tag="mrcbU14"> 85116454250 SCOPUS </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbU24"> PUBMED </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbU34"> 000711926000023 WOS </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbU63"> cav_un_epca*0546852 Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. 16th European Conference, ECSQARU 2021 Proceedings Springer 2021 Cham 314 327 978-3-030-86771-3 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 12897 0302-9743 </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbU67"> Vejnarová J. 340 </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbU67"> Wilson N. 340 </unknown> </cas_special> </bibitem>