<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="style/detail_T.xsl"?>
<bibitem type="J">   <ARLID>0557719</ARLID> <utime>20240402213500.7</utime><mtime>20220530235959.9</mtime>   <SCOPUS>85130531084</SCOPUS> <WOS>000796440200001</WOS>  <DOI>10.1080/02331934.2022.2076232</DOI>           <title language="eng" primary="1">Value at risk approach to producer's best response in an electricity market with uncertain demand</title>  <specification> <page_count>23 s.</page_count> <media_type>P</media_type> </specification>   <serial><ARLID>cav_un_epca*0258218</ARLID><ISSN>0233-1934</ISSN><title>Optimization</title><part_num/><part_title/><volume_id>72</volume_id><volume>11 (2023)</volume><page_num>2745-2767</page_num><publisher><place/><name>Taylor &amp; Francis</name><year/></publisher></serial>    <keyword>electricity market</keyword>   <keyword>multileader-common-follower game</keyword>   <keyword>stochastic demand</keyword>   <keyword>day-ahead bidding</keyword>   <keyword>chance constraints</keyword>    <author primary="1"> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0280972</ARLID> <name1>Branda</name1> <name2>Martin</name2> <institution>UTIA-B</institution> <full_dept language="cz">Matematická teorie rozhodování</full_dept> <full_dept language="eng">Department of Decision Making Theory</full_dept> <department language="cz">MTR</department> <department language="eng">MTR</department> <full_dept>Department of Decision Making Theory</full_dept> <country>CZ</country> <fullinstit>Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.</fullinstit> </author> <author primary="0"> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0015558</ARLID> <name1>Henrion</name1> <name2>R.</name2> <country>DE</country> </author> <author primary="0"> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0234872</ARLID> <name1>Pištěk</name1> <name2>Miroslav</name2> <institution>UTIA-B</institution> <full_dept language="cz">Matematická teorie rozhodování</full_dept> <full_dept>Department of Decision Making Theory</full_dept> <department language="cz">MTR</department> <department>MTR</department> <full_dept>Department of Decision Making Theory</full_dept> <country>CZ</country> <fullinstit>Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.</fullinstit> </author>   <source> <url>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02331934.2022.2076232</url>  </source> <source> <url>http://library.utia.cas.cz/separaty/2022/MTR/pistek-0557719.pdf</url> </source>        <cas_special> <project> <project_id>GA18-04145S</project_id> <agency>GA ČR</agency> <country>CZ</country> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0373104</ARLID> </project> <project> <project_id>GA21-07494S</project_id> <agency>GA ČR</agency> <country>CZ</country> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0430801</ARLID> </project>  <abstract language="eng" primary="1">We deal with several sources of uncertainty in electricity markets. The independent system operator (ISO) maximizes the social welfare using chance constraints to hedge against discrepancies between the estimated and real electricity demand. We find an explicit solution to the ISO problem and use it to tackle the problem of a producer. In our model, production, as well as the income of a producer, are determined based on the estimated electricity demand predicted by the ISO, which is unknown to producers. Thus, each producer is hedging against the uncertainty of the prediction of the demand using the value-at-risk approach. To illustrate our results, a numerical study of a producer's best response given a historical distribution of both estimated and real electricity demand is provided.</abstract>     <result_subspec>WOS</result_subspec> <RIV>AH</RIV> <FORD0>10000</FORD0> <FORD1>10100</FORD1> <FORD2>10102</FORD2>    <reportyear>2024</reportyear>     <inst_support> RVO:67985556 </inst_support>  <permalink>https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0346178</permalink>   <confidential>S</confidential>  <unknown tag="mrcbC86"> Article Operations Research Management Science|Mathematics Applied </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbC91"> A </unknown>         <unknown tag="mrcbT16-e">MATHEMATICS.APPLIED|OPERATIONSRESEARCH&amp;MANAGEMENTSCIENCE</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-f">1.9</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-g">0.3</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-h">5.9</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-i">0.00431</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-j">0.652</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-k">3146</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-q">63</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-s">0.699</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-y">35.08</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-x">1.85</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-3">828</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-4">Q2</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-5">1.500</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-6">129</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-7">Q2</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-C">56.3</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-D">Q3</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-E">Q2</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-M">0.7</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-N">Q2</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-P">73.3</unknown> <arlyear>2023</arlyear>       <unknown tag="mrcbU14"> 85130531084 SCOPUS </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbU24"> PUBMED </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbU34"> 000796440200001 WOS </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbU63"> cav_un_epca*0258218 Optimization 72 11 2023 2745 2767 0233-1934 1029-4945 Taylor &amp; Francis </unknown> </cas_special> </bibitem>