<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="style/detail_T.xsl"?>
<bibitem type="J">   <ARLID>0599014</ARLID> <utime>20260224154314.1</utime><mtime>20241007235959.9</mtime>   <SCOPUS>85196257573</SCOPUS> <WOS>001250706200001</WOS>  <DOI>10.1080/13504851.2024.2363295</DOI>           <title language="eng" primary="1">Beyond GARCH in cryptocurrency volatility modelling: superiority of range-based estimators</title>  <specification> <page_count>8 s.</page_count> <media_type>P</media_type> </specification>   <serial><ARLID>cav_un_epca*0250118</ARLID><ISSN>1350-4851</ISSN><title>Applied Economics Letters</title><part_num/><part_title/><volume_id>32</volume_id><volume>21 (2025)</volume><page_num>3113-3120</page_num><publisher><place/><name>Routledge</name><year/></publisher></serial>    <keyword>Cryptoasset</keyword>   <keyword>GARCH</keyword>   <keyword>Garman-Klass</keyword>   <keyword>volatility</keyword>   <keyword>cryptocurrency</keyword>    <author primary="1"> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0474007</ARLID> <name1>Sun</name1> <name2>W.</name2> <country>CZ</country> </author> <author primary="0"> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0256902</ARLID> <name1>Krištoufek</name1> <name2>Ladislav</name2> <institution>UTIA-B</institution> <full_dept language="cz">Ekonometrie</full_dept> <full_dept>Department of Econometrics</full_dept> <department language="cz">E</department> <department>E</department> <full_dept>Department of Econometrics</full_dept> <country>CZ</country> <fullinstit>Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.</fullinstit> </author>   <source> <url>https://library.utia.cas.cz/separaty/2024/E/kristoufek-0599014.pdf</url> </source> <source> <url>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504851.2024.2363295</url>  </source>        <cas_special> <project> <project_id>GA23-06606S</project_id> <agency>GA ČR</agency> <country>CZ</country> <ARLID>cav_un_auth*0458718</ARLID> </project>  <abstract language="eng" primary="1">Cryptoassets are extremely volatile with possible volatility jumps and infrastructure noise, making the estimation of true volatility process challenging. When the high-frequency data are not available, the true volatility needs to be estimated to be further studied or forecasted. The GARCH-family models have become a norm in the field. Here, we examine the performance of 6 GARCH-type specifications with 4 distributional assumptions and compare them with 4 non-parametric range-based models built on the daily ‘candles’. Our study focuses on five popular cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB, XRP, and Dogecoin) between 1 July 2019 and 30 September 2022, utilizing Binance 5-minute data for realized measures as the high-frequency estimators of the true volatility process. The results reveal that the Garman-Klass estimator clearly outperforms the GARCH-family models in all studied settings, and the other range-based estimators remain competitive with the GARCH-family models. These results are crucial for studies on volatility in cryptoassets where using the GARCH-type models is a standard. When the high-frequency data are not available, the range-based estimators, and the Garman-Klass estimator in particular, should be preferred as proxies for the true volatility process over the GARCH-type models, be it in the in-sample, more qualitative studies, or the forecasting, out-of-sample exercises.</abstract>     <result_subspec>WOS</result_subspec> <RIV>AH</RIV> <FORD0>50000</FORD0> <FORD1>50200</FORD1> <FORD2>50206</FORD2>    <reportyear>2026</reportyear>      <num_of_auth>2</num_of_auth>  <inst_support> RVO:67985556 </inst_support>  <permalink>https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0357192</permalink>   <confidential>S</confidential>  <unknown tag="mrcbC91"> C </unknown>         <unknown tag="mrcbT16-e">ECONOMICS</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-f">1.3</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-g">0.4</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-h">5.2</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-i">0.00507</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-j">0.28</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-k">6139</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-q">67</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-s">0.384</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-y">14.09</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-x">1.64</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-3">2170</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-4">Q3</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-5">1.100</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-6">587</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-7">Q3</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-C">47</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-M">0.37</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-N">Q3</unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbT16-P">46.5</unknown> <arlyear>2025</arlyear>       <unknown tag="mrcbU14"> 85196257573 SCOPUS </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbU24"> PUBMED </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbU34"> 001250706200001 WOS </unknown> <unknown tag="mrcbU63"> cav_un_epca*0250118 Applied Economics Letters 32 21 2025 3113 3120 1350-4851 1466-4291 Routledge </unknown> </cas_special> </bibitem>