bibtype V - Research Report
ARLID 0357268
utime 20240103194938.3
mtime 20110304235959.9
title (primary) (eng) Sequential Retreating Search Methods in Feature Selection
publisher
place Praha
name ÚTIA
pub_time 2010
specification
page_count 21 s.
edition
name Research Report
volume_id 2286
keyword feature selection
keyword wrappers
keyword sequential search
keyword subset search
keyword method evaluation
keyword classifier performance
keyword pattern recognition
author (primary)
ARLID cav_un_auth*0101197
name1 Somol
name2 Petr
full_dept (cz) Rozpoznávání obrazu
full_dept (eng) Department of Pattern Recognition
department (cz) RO
department (eng) RO
institution UTIA-B
full_dept Department of Pattern Recognition
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0101182
name1 Pudil
name2 Pavel
full_dept (cz) Rozpoznávání obrazu
full_dept Department of Pattern Recognition
department (cz) RO
department RO
institution UTIA-B
full_dept Department of Pattern Recognition
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
cas_special
project
project_id 1M0572
agency GA MŠk
ARLID cav_un_auth*0001814
project
project_id GA402/03/1310
agency GA ČR
country CZ
ARLID cav_un_auth*0009030
project
project_id IAA2075302
agency GA AV ČR
ARLID cav_un_auth*0001801
project
project_id 2C06019
agency GA MŠk
country CZ
ARLID cav_un_auth*0216518
research CEZ:AV0Z10750506
abstract (eng) Inspired by Floating Search, our new pair of methods, the Sequential Forward Retreating Search (SFRS) and Sequential Backward Retreating Search (SBRS) is exceptionally suitable for Wrapper based feature selection. (Conversely, it cannot be used with monotonic criteria.) Unlike most of other known sub-optimal search methods, both the SFRS and SBRS are parameter-free deterministic sequential procedures that incorporate in the optimization process both the search for the best subset and the determination of the best subset size. The subset yielded by either of the two new methods is to be expected closer to optimum than the best of all subsets yielded in one run of the Floating Search. Retreating Search time complexity is to be expected slightly worse but in the same order of magnitude as that of the Floating Search. In addition to introducing the new methods we provide a testing framework to evaluate them with respect to other existing tools.
reportyear 2011
RIV BD
permalink http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0195586
arlyear 2010
mrcbU10 2010
mrcbU10 Praha ÚTIA