bibtype J - Journal Article
ARLID 0370515
utime 20240103200158.3
mtime 20120109235959.9
WOS 000288470100003
SCOPUS 79551681370
DOI 10.1016/j.ijar.2010.02.005
title (primary) (eng) Compositional models and conditional independence in evidence theory
specification
page_count 19 s.
serial
ARLID cav_un_epca*0256774
ISSN 0888-613X
title International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
volume_id 52
volume 3 (2011)
page_num 316-334
publisher
name Elsevier
keyword Evidence theory
keyword Conditional independence
keyword multidimensional models
author (primary)
ARLID cav_un_auth*0101118
name1 Jiroušek
name2 Radim
full_dept (cz) Matematická teorie rozhodování
full_dept (eng) Department of Decision Making Theory
department (cz) MTR
department (eng) MTR
institution UTIA-B
full_dept Department of Decision Making Theory
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0101223
name1 Vejnarová
name2 Jiřina
full_dept (cz) Matematická teorie rozhodování
full_dept Department of Decision Making Theory
department (cz) MTR
department MTR
institution UTIA-B
full_dept Department of Decision Making Theory
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
source
url http://library.utia.cas.cz/separaty/2012/MTR/jirousek-0370515.pdf
cas_special
research CEZ:AV0Z10750506
abstract (eng) The goal of the paper is twofold. The first is to show that some of the ideas for representation of multidimensional distributions in probability and possibility theories can be transferred into evidence theory. Namely, we show that multidimensional basic assignments can be rather efficiently represented in a form of so-called compositional models. These models are based on the iterative application of the operator of composition, whose definition for basic assignments as well as its properties are presented. We also prove that the operator of composition in evidence theory is in a sense generalization of its probabilistic counterpart. The second goal of the paper is to introduce a new definition of conditional independence in evidence theory and to show in what sense it is superior to that formerly introduced by other authors.
reportyear 2012
RIV BA
num_of_auth 2
mrcbC52 4 A 4a 20231122134849.5
permalink http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0204303
mrcbT16-e COMPUTERSCIENCEARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE
mrcbT16-f 2.155
mrcbT16-g 0.293
mrcbT16-h 4.7
mrcbT16-i 0.00594
mrcbT16-j 0.759
mrcbT16-k 1638
mrcbT16-l 92
mrcbT16-s 1.703
mrcbT16-4 Q1
mrcbT16-B 70.492
mrcbT16-C 76.126
mrcbT16-D Q2
mrcbT16-E Q1*
arlyear 2011
mrcbTft \nSoubory v repozitáři: jirousek-0370515.pdf
mrcbU14 79551681370 SCOPUS
mrcbU34 000288470100003 WOS
mrcbU63 cav_un_epca*0256774 International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 0888-613X 1873-4731 Roč. 52 č. 3 2011 316 334 Elsevier