bibtype J - Journal Article
ARLID 0395960
utime 20240103202930.0
mtime 20140801235959.9
WOS 000338212000008
DOI 10.1007/s00276-013-1184-3
title (primary) (eng) Medial calcar of proximal humeral fracture as landmark in restoration of humeral length in case of hemiarthroplasty
specification
page_count 7 s.
media_type P
serial
ARLID cav_un_epca*0255167
ISSN 0930-1038
title Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
volume_id 35
volume 5 (2014)
page_num 473-479
keyword Fracture of proximal humerus
keyword Calcar of humeral fracture
keyword Reconstruction of proximal humerus
keyword Reconstruction of humeral length
keyword Shoulder arthroplasty
keyword Shoulder hemiarthroplasty
author (primary)
ARLID cav_un_auth*0294145
name1 Hromádka
name2 R.
country CZ
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0264564
name1 Kuběna
name2 Aleš Antonín
full_dept (cz) Ekonometrie
full_dept Department of Econometrics
department (cz) E
department E
institution UTIA-B
full_dept Department of Econometrics
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0101206
name1 Šmíd
name2 Martin
full_dept (cz) Ekonometrie
full_dept Department of Econometrics
department (cz) E
department E
institution UTIA-B
full_dept Department of Econometrics
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0264874
name1 Popelka
name2 S.
country CZ
source
url http://library.utia.cas.cz/separaty/2013/E/smid-medial calcar of proximal humeral fracture as landmark in restoration of humeral length in case of hemiarthroplasty.pdf
cas_special
abstract (eng) Purpose Several methods to restore the appropriate length of the humerus in the case of proximal humeral fractures treated by hemiarthroplasty have been previously published. Our study evaluates the possibility of using the medial calcar of humerus for humeral length reconstruction not based on preoperative planning. Methods Preparations of 320 dry humeral bones were used for the purpose of the study. Points of interest were marked on each bone: the most proximal point of the humeral head, the crest of greater tuberosity, diameters of the head, the anatomical and surgical necks. Proximal parts of bones were then scanned from two angles with a digital camera and all measurements were performed on calibrated photographs. We compared accuracy in humeral length reconstruction using insertion of the pectoralis major and the area of medial calcar where usually a fracture develops. Results The distance between the top part of the humeral head and the insertion of pectoralis major was 54.1 ± 6.0 mm.
reportyear 2015
RIV FJ
inst_support RVO:67985556
permalink http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0224123
confidential S
mrcbT16-e ANATOMYMORPHOLOGY|RADIOLOGYNUCLEARMEDICINEMEDICALIMAGING|SURGERY
mrcbT16-j 0.345
mrcbT16-s 0.562
mrcbT16-4 Q2
mrcbT16-B 18.099
mrcbT16-C 25.687
mrcbT16-D Q4
mrcbT16-E Q3
arlyear 2014
mrcbU34 000338212000008 WOS
mrcbU63 cav_un_epca*0255167 Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 0930-1038 1279-8517 Roč. 35 č. 5 2014 473 479