bibtype C - Conference Paper (international conference)
ARLID 0453669
utime 20240103211551.8
mtime 20160215235959.9
WOS 000387956200026
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0207-6_26
title (primary) (eng) Theoretical models of decision-making in the Ultimatum Game: Fairness vs. Reason
specification
page_count 6 s.
media_type P
serial
ARLID cav_un_epca*0453668
ISBN 978-981-10-0205-2
ISSN 2213-3569
title Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (V)
part_title Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Neurodynamics - 2015
page_num 185-191
publisher
place Singapur
name Springer-Verlag
year 2016
editor
name1 Wang
name2 Rubin
editor
name1 Pan
name2 Xiaochuan
keyword fairness
keyword rationality
keyword Ultimatum game
keyword decision making
author (primary)
ARLID cav_un_auth*0101092
full_dept (cz) Adaptivní systémy
full_dept (eng) Department of Adaptive Systems
department (cz) AS
department (eng) AS
full_dept Department of Adaptive Systems
name1 Guy
name2 Tatiana Valentine
institution UTIA-B
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0101124
full_dept (cz) Adaptivní systémy
full_dept Department of Adaptive Systems
department (cz) AS
department AS
full_dept Department of Adaptive Systems
name1 Kárný
name2 Miroslav
institution UTIA-B
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0328216
name1 Villa
name2 A. P.
country CH
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0328217
name1 Lintas
name2 A.
country CH
source
url http://library.utia.cas.cz/separaty/2016/AS/guy-0453669.pdf
cas_special
project
ARLID cav_un_auth*0292725
project_id GA13-13502S
agency GA ČR
abstract (eng) According to Game Theory a human subject playing the Ultimatum Game should choose more for oneself and offer the least amount possible for co-players (assumption of selfish rationality) [1]. However, economy, sociology and neurology communities repeatedly claim nonrationality of the human behaviour [2], following the observation that responders reject offers they find too low and proposers often offer more than the smallest amount, thus suggesting that humans’ behaviour is significantly influenced by social norms. We also assume human rationality, but our model describes a human-responder via decision process with a reward function respecting fairness as much as the economic profit. This model is positively tested against a set of original experimental data, thus providing an insight into human’s motivation as a social being.
action
ARLID cav_un_auth*0325081
name ICCN 2015
dates 03.06.2015-07.06.2015
place Sanya
country CN
RIV BB
reportyear 2016
presentation_type ZP
inst_support RVO:67985556
permalink http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0257058
mrcbC62 1
cooperation
ARLID cav_un_auth*0305008
name University of Lausanne
country CH
confidential S
mrcbC86 3+4 Proceedings Paper Neurosciences
arlyear 2016
mrcbU34 000387956200026 WOS
mrcbU63 cav_un_epca*0453668 Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (V) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Neurodynamics - 2015 978-981-10-0205-2 2213-3569 185 191 Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (V) Singapur Springer-Verlag 2016 Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics 1
mrcbU67 Wang Rubin 340
mrcbU67 Pan Xiaochuan 340