bibtype V - Research Report
ARLID 0533386
utime 20240103224558.5
mtime 20201022235959.9
title (primary) (eng) Financial Crime and Punishment: A Meta-Analysis
publisher
place Praha
name UK FSV – IES
pub_time 2020
specification
page_count 62 s.
media_type P
edition
name IES Working Paper Series
volume_id 2020/40
keyword Meta-Analysis
keyword Event study
keyword Financial Misconduct
keyword Fraud
keyword Financial Markets
keyword Returns
keyword Listed Companies
keyword Information and Market Efficiency
author (primary)
ARLID cav_un_auth*0397896
share 50
name1 de Batz
name2 L.
country FR
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0312139
share 50
name1 Kočenda
name2 Evžen
institution UTIA-B
full_dept (cz) Ekonometrie
full_dept Department of Econometrics
department (cz) E
department E
full_dept Department of Econometrics
country CZ
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
source
url http://library.utia.cas.cz/separaty/2020/E/kocenda-0533386.pdf
cas_special
project
ARLID cav_un_auth*0397907
project_id GA20-17044S
agency GA ČR
country CZ
abstract (eng) We examine how the publication of intentional financial crimes committed by listed firms is interpreted by financial markets, using a systematic and quantitative review of existing empirical studies. Specifically, we conduct a meta-regression analysis and investigate the extent and nature of the impact that the publication of financial misconducts exerts on stock returns. We survey 111 studies, published between 1978 and 2020, with a total of 439 estimates from event studies. Our key finding is that the average abnormal returns calculated from this empirical literature are affected by a negative publication selection bias. Still, after controlling for this bias, our meta-analysis indicates that publications of financial crimes are followed by statistically significant negative abnormal returns, which suggests the existence of an informational effect. Finally, the MRA results demonstrate that crimes committed in common law countries, alleged crimes, and accounting crimes carry particularly weighty information for market participants. The results call for more transparency on side of enforcers along enforcement procedures, to foster timely and proportionate market reactions and support efficient markets.
RIV AH
FORD0 50000
FORD1 50200
FORD2 50206
reportyear 2021
num_of_auth 2
inst_support RVO:67985556
permalink http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0311791
confidential S
arlyear 2020
mrcbU02 V
mrcbU10 2020
mrcbU10 Praha UK FSV – IES