bibtype C - Conference Paper (international conference)
ARLID 0545791
utime 20220320214337.5
mtime 20210923235959.9
SCOPUS 85114277860
title (primary) (eng) Flexible negotiation process to adhere to human preferences - A case of work equipment risk assessment
specification
page_count 5 s.
media_type E
serial
ARLID cav_un_epca*0547381
ISBN 978-099105769-6
title Proceedings - 26th ISSAT International Conference on Reliability and Quality in Design, RQD 2021
page_num 261-265
publisher
place Edison
name International Society of Science and Applied Technologies
year 2021
editor
name1 Pham
name2 H.
keyword Decision-making
keyword Feedback relations
keyword Work equipment management
author (primary)
ARLID cav_un_auth*0398866
name1 Carpitella
name2 Silvia
institution UTIA-B
full_dept (cz) Matematická teorie rozhodování
full_dept (eng) Department of Decision Making Theory
department (cz) MTR
department (eng) MTR
country IT
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0399068
name1 Certa
name2 A.
country IT
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0256480
name1 Izquierdo
name2 J.
country ES
source
url http://library.utia.cas.cz/separaty/2021/MTR/carpitella-0545791.pdf
cas_special
project
project_id GA19-06569S
agency GA ČR
country CZ
ARLID cav_un_auth*0380559
abstract (eng) Making structured and reliable decisions on relevant business problems often requires expert assistance. In decision making practice, experts are frequently required to pairwise compare elements to support the decision made. This paper proposes a user-friendly negotiation procedure to establish an effective feedback relation with experts to globally increase the consistency of their pairwise comparisons judgments, where necessary. To this aim, we develop a flexible tool, which makes use of an algebraic consistency-improving algorithm and a sensitivity analysis technique to identify which judgments contribute most to inconsistency. The framework pursues friendliness for the involved decision makers, as they are asked to reconsider only a few a priori judgments, instead of rethinking the entire set of previously elicited comparisons. A real-world case study on risk assessment in industry is implemented to demonstrate the practical applicability of the proposed approach.
action
ARLID cav_un_auth*0414182
name ISSAT International Conference on Reliability and Quality in Design 2021 /26./
dates 20210805
mrcbC20-s 20210807
place Edison (on-line)
country US
RIV BB
FORD0 10000
FORD1 10100
FORD2 10103
reportyear 2022
num_of_auth 3
presentation_type PR
inst_support RVO:67985556
permalink http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0323618
confidential S
arlyear 2021
mrcbU14 85114277860 SCOPUS
mrcbU24 PUBMED
mrcbU34 WOS
mrcbU63 cav_un_epca*0547381 Proceedings - 26th ISSAT International Conference on Reliability and Quality in Design, RQD 2021 International Society of Science and Applied Technologies 2021 Edison 261 265 978-099105769-6
mrcbU67 Pham H. 340