bibtype C - Conference Paper (international conference)
ARLID 0549078
utime 20220320214746.8
mtime 20211202235959.9
title (primary) (eng) Improved pairwise comparison transitivity using strategically selected reduced information
specification
page_count 5 s.
media_type P
serial
ARLID cav_un_epca*0549077
ISBN 978-84-09-36287-5
title Modelling for Engineering & Human Behaviour 2021
page_num 106-110
publisher
place Valencie
name Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
year 2021
keyword pairwise comparison
keyword decision modelling
keyword decision-making
author (primary)
ARLID cav_un_auth*0399066
name1 Benítez
name2 J.
country ES
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0398866
name1 Carpitella
name2 Silvia
institution UTIA-B
full_dept (cz) Matematická teorie rozhodování
full_dept Department of Decision Making Theory
department (cz) MTR
department MTR
country IT
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0256480
name1 Izquierdo
name2 J.
country ES
source
url http://library.utia.cas.cz/separaty/2021/MTR/carpitella-0549078.pdf
cas_special
project
project_id GA19-06569S
agency GA ČR
country CZ
ARLID cav_un_auth*0380559
abstract (eng) To judge the mutual relationship among elements, pairwise comparisons (PC) are widely used in decision modelling. PC is especially useful when the involved elements are intangible. Frequently, the number of elements to be compared may be very large. When dealing with n elements, the number of PCs is, under the reciprocity hypothesis, n(n − 1)/2. PCs are compiled in so-called pairwise comparison matrices (PCM). In the presence of missing entries due to uncertainty or lack of information, decision-making must be performed from the available incomplete information. Making all the comparisons in the complete case may be tedious, strenuous and time-consuming for the actors, may blur the body of judgment, and produce weak priorities and unreliable decisions, thus leading to wrong and harmful conclusions. We claim that a sample of PCs involving less than that number of comparisons may be suitable to develop sound decisions. As the problem has no general solution, we analyse and solve the case in which PCs focus on comparing the elements against only a reduced number of pivotal specific elements. This case include, among others, two practical cases: the actor is more familiar with those pivotal specific elements, and the Best-Worst method [1] has been used to identify the two extreme elements in the set. The approach, developed within the linearization theory [2], is supported with rigorous Mathematics, numerical tests and examples and may be implemented using straightforward and simple computational codes.
action
ARLID cav_un_auth*0418154
name Mathematical Modelling Conference in Engineering & Human Behaviour 2021
dates 20210714
mrcbC20-s 20210716
place Valencia
country ES
RIV BA
FORD0 10000
FORD1 10100
FORD2 10102
reportyear 2022
num_of_auth 3
presentation_type PR
inst_support RVO:67985556
permalink http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0325733
confidential S
arlyear 2021
mrcbU14 SCOPUS
mrcbU24 PUBMED
mrcbU34 WOS
mrcbU63 cav_un_epca*0549077 Modelling for Engineering & Human Behaviour 2021 Universidad Politécnica de Valencia 2021 Valencie 106 110 978-84-09-36287-5