bibtype J - Journal Article
ARLID 0557718
utime 20230323164551.8
mtime 20220530235959.9
SCOPUS 85126665738
WOS 000805828400016
DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108089
title (primary) (eng) Multi-criteria decision analysis without consistency in pairwise comparisons
specification
page_count 11 s.
media_type P
serial
ARLID cav_un_epca*0252554
ISSN 0360-8352
title Computers & Industrial Engineering
volume_id 168
publisher
name Elsevier
keyword Decision-Making Theory
keyword Decision Support Systems
keyword Analytic Hierarchy Process
keyword Intransitive Preferences
keyword Skew-symmetric Bi-linear Representation
author (primary)
ARLID cav_un_auth*0398866
name1 Carpitella
name2 Silvia
institution UTIA-B
full_dept (cz) Matematická teorie rozhodování
full_dept (eng) Department of Decision Making Theory
department (cz) MTR
department (eng) MTR
country IT
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0382032
name1 Inuiguchi
name2 M.
country JP
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0216188
name1 Kratochvíl
name2 Václav
institution UTIA-B
full_dept (cz) Matematická teorie rozhodování
full_dept Department of Decision Making Theory
department (cz) MTR
department MTR
full_dept Department of Decision Making Theory
country CZ
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0234872
name1 Pištěk
name2 Miroslav
institution UTIA-B
full_dept (cz) Matematická teorie rozhodování
full_dept Department of Decision Making Theory
department (cz) MTR
department MTR
full_dept Department of Decision Making Theory
country CZ
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
source
url http://library.utia.cas.cz/separaty/2022/MTR/pistek-0557718.pdf
source
url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835222001590?via%3Dihub
cas_special
project
project_id GA19-06569S
agency GA ČR
country CZ
ARLID cav_un_auth*0380559
abstract (eng) Life itself is colorful and brings situations where making the right decision is a matter of compromise given the various criteria, often conflicting with each other. To handle such situations, a plethora of mathematical methods supporting decision-making has been developed. A little attention has been paid to cases where either criteria or expert preferences are not transitive by nature. Usually, standard decision-making methods handle such a case as an input error (input inconsistency). Being designed for consistent cases, standard methods may conclude in wrong results. We present a novel framework aimed at dealing with inconsistent preferences, without forcing experts to reconsider their initial judgments thus distorting their spontaneous assessments. A simulation analysis has been led to check the methodological validity of our proposal. Specifically, by setting different consistency ranges, thousands of experiments on simulated matrices confirm that our framework represents a valid alternative to the traditional practice. The applicability of the proposed approach has been eventually demonstrated through a real-world case study focused on supply chain management of a relevant industrial problem.
result_subspec WOS
RIV AH
FORD0 50000
FORD1 50200
FORD2 50204
reportyear 2023
inst_support RVO:67985556
permalink http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0331639
confidential S
article_num 108089
mrcbC86 n.a. Article Computer Science Interdisciplinary Applications|Engineering Industrial
mrcbC91 C
mrcbT16-e COMPUTERSCIENCEINTERDISCIPLINARYAPPLICATIONS|ENGINEERINGINDUSTRIAL
mrcbT16-j 1.139
mrcbT16-s 1.76
mrcbT16-D Q2
mrcbT16-E Q1*
arlyear 2022
mrcbU14 85126665738 SCOPUS
mrcbU24 PUBMED
mrcbU34 000805828400016 WOS
mrcbU63 cav_un_epca*0252554 Computers & Industrial Engineering 0360-8352 1879-0550 Roč. 168 č. 1 2022 Elsevier