bibtype J - Journal Article
ARLID 0647611
utime 20260417124737.0
mtime 20260318235959.9
SCOPUS 105033249378
WOS 001719798300001
DOI 10.1080/23311916.2026.2641308
title (primary) (eng) Evaluating Texture Quality and Similarity Metrics for Visual Recognition and Modeling
specification
page_count 25 s.
media_type E
serial
ARLID cav_un_epca*0634767
ISSN 2331-1916
title Cogent Engineering
volume_id 13
keyword Human quality ranking
keyword texture quality criteria
keyword image quality criteria
keyword texture quality benchmark
keyword Spearman correlation
author (primary)
ARLID cav_un_auth*0101093
name1 Haindl
name2 Michal
institution UTIA-B
full_dept (cz) Rozpoznávání obrazu
full_dept (eng) Department of Pattern Recognition
department (cz) RO
department (eng) RO
full_dept Department of Pattern Recognition
garant K
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
author
ARLID cav_un_auth*0505664
name1 Shaikh
name2 Nahidbanu
institution UTIA-B
full_dept (cz) Rozpoznávání obrazu
full_dept Department of Pattern Recognition
department (cz) RO
department RO
country IN
fullinstit Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, v. v. i.
source
url http://library.utia.cas.cz/separaty/2026/RO/haindl-0647611.pdf
source
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311916.2026.2641308
cas_special
abstract (eng) Visual scene recognition and modeling fundamentally rely on visual textures, which encapsulate an object's varying material properties. The texture of a single material exhibits variations in scale illumination and viewing angles, influenced by factors such as the object's shape, alterations in lighting, and observational distance. This study aims to comprehensively compare various texture quality and similarity metrics proposed in prior research, evaluating their alignment with psychophysically derived human rankings using our texture quality benchmark. The ultimate goal is to replace cumbersome, costly, and impractical psychophysical evaluations-currently required for every synthesis or recognition experiment-with more efficient, objective numerical alternatives suitable for recognition and physically accurate texture modeling. The statistically analyzed quality measures either originate from texture quality assessment research or were initially developed for general image evaluation but can be applied to textures without requiring pixelwise correspondence between compared samples. Such numerical measures are fundamental for visual scene recognition and physically correct synthesis or editing applications in virtual prototyping. Our findings highlight the outstanding performance of two multispectral measures derived from the adaptive recursively evaluated Markovian descriptive model. Despite considerable progress in recent years, there remains room for enhancement in the current state-of-the-art texture quality assessment methods. The evaluated approaches require additional refinement to ensure their reliability across various computer vision and pattern recognition domains.
result_subspec WOS
RIV BD
FORD0 20000
FORD1 20200
FORD2 20205
reportyear 2027
num_of_auth 2
inst_support RVO:67985556
permalink https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0378167
cooperation
ARLID cav_un_auth*0417618
name Faculty of Information Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague
country NL
confidential S
article_num 2641308
mrcbC91 A
mrcbT16-e ENGINEERING.MULTIDISCIPLINARY
mrcbT16-f 2.2
mrcbT16-g 0.7
mrcbT16-h 4.3
mrcbT16-i 0.00269
mrcbT16-j 0.324
mrcbT16-k 4023
mrcbT16-q 51
mrcbT16-s 0.476
mrcbT16-y 47.45
mrcbT16-x 3.51
mrcbT16-3 2355
mrcbT16-4 Q2
mrcbT16-5 2.400
mrcbT16-6 356
mrcbT16-7 Q2
mrcbT16-C 72.3
mrcbT16-M 0.63
mrcbT16-N Q2
mrcbT16-P 72.3
arlyear 2026
mrcbU14 105033249378 SCOPUS
mrcbU24 PUBMED
mrcbU34 001719798300001 WOS
mrcbU63 cav_un_epca*0634767 Cogent Engineering 13 1 2026 2331-1916 2331-1916